Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 19.03.21 um 03:58 schrieb Wang Qing:
Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics

Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree than DRM?

Thanks,
Christian.

---
  drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7475e09..de51326
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
  	struct default_wait_cb *wait =
  		container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
- wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
+	wake_up_process(wait->task);
  }
/**

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux