[PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly, 
and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics

Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7475e09..de51326
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
 	struct default_wait_cb *wait =
 		container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
 
-	wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
+	wake_up_process(wait->task);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux