On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 20:51:41 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:40:35PM +0800, Carlis wrote: > > @@ -82,6 +111,29 @@ enum st7789v_command { > > */ > > static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par) > > { > > + int rc; > > + struct device *dev = par->info->device; > > + > > + par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0, > > GPIOD_IN); > > + if (par->gpio.te) { > > I explained in my earlier review that devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() > can return error pointers... There was quite a bit of detail about > how to handle this correctly in my earlier review, but I think you > might not have noticed it. Please read it again. > > > + init_completion(&spi_panel_te); > > + mutex_init(&te_mutex); > > + rc = devm_request_irq(dev, > > + gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te), > > + spi_panel_te_handler, > > IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, > > + "TE_GPIO", par); > > + if (rc) { > > + pr_err("TE request_irq failed.\n"); > > + devm_gpiod_put(dev, par->gpio.te); > > + par->gpio.te = NULL; > > + } else { > > + > > disable_irq_nosync(gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te)); > > + pr_info("TE request_irq completion.\n"); > > + } > > + } else { > > + pr_err("%s:%d, TE gpio not specified\n", > > + __func__, __LINE__); > > + } > > regards, > dan carpenter > Thank you for your correction,i will change pr_err to pr_info in next patch v5 regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel