On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:40:35PM +0800, Carlis wrote: > @@ -82,6 +111,29 @@ enum st7789v_command { > */ > static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par) > { > + int rc; > + struct device *dev = par->info->device; > + > + par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0, GPIOD_IN); > + if (par->gpio.te) { I explained in my earlier review that devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() can return error pointers... There was quite a bit of detail about how to handle this correctly in my earlier review, but I think you might not have noticed it. Please read it again. > + init_completion(&spi_panel_te); > + mutex_init(&te_mutex); > + rc = devm_request_irq(dev, > + gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te), > + spi_panel_te_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, > + "TE_GPIO", par); > + if (rc) { > + pr_err("TE request_irq failed.\n"); > + devm_gpiod_put(dev, par->gpio.te); > + par->gpio.te = NULL; > + } else { > + disable_irq_nosync(gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te)); > + pr_info("TE request_irq completion.\n"); > + } > + } else { > + pr_err("%s:%d, TE gpio not specified\n", > + __func__, __LINE__); > + } regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel