On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:10 PM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 27.11.20 um 09:31 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> > Oops sorry for delay LGTM
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 02:34, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 3:34 PM Christian König
> >> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Reorder the code to fix checking if blitting is available.
> >> Might be good to explain why blitting might not be available, e.g.
> >> suspend/resume and or chip death and stuff like that.
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> >> Needs Fixes: 28a68f828266 ("drm/radeon/ttm: use multihop")
>
> Why does the subject of the patch needs to be in "()" ? I was already
> wondering why dim sometimes complains about my Fixes tag.
Hm I thought that's the official style. I kinda hacked around on it
until linux-next stopped complaining about our Fixes: tags. Maybe it's
not quite accurately reflecting the current bikeshed. Iirc checkpatch
even complains when you leave out the commit before the sha1, at least
in free-form text in the commit message.
-Daniel
> >>
> >> Btw
> >>
> >> $ dim fixes [sha1]
> >>
> >> generates that for you plus nice cc list of offenders. With the Fixes
> >> line added:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> >>
> >> At least I'm hanging onto the illusion that I understand what you did here :-)
> >> -Daniel
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 54 +++++++++++++----------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> >>> index 0ca381b95d3d..2b598141225f 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> >>> @@ -216,27 +216,15 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> >>> struct ttm_resource *old_mem = &bo->mem;
> >>> int r;
> >>>
> >>> - if ((old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> >>> - new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) ||
> >>> - (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
> >>> - new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)) {
> >>> - hop->fpfn = 0;
> >>> - hop->lpfn = 0;
> >>> - hop->mem_type = TTM_PL_TT;
> >>> - hop->flags = 0;
> >>> - return -EMULTIHOP;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> if (new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) {
> >>> r = radeon_ttm_tt_bind(bo->bdev, bo->ttm, new_mem);
> >>> if (r)
> >>> return r;
> >>> }
> >>> - radeon_bo_move_notify(bo, evict, new_mem);
> >>>
> >>> r = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, ctx);
> >>> if (r)
> >>> - goto fail;
> >>> + return r;
> >>>
> >>> /* Can't move a pinned BO */
> >>> rbo = container_of(bo, struct radeon_bo, tbo);
> >>> @@ -246,12 +234,12 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> >>> rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->bdev);
> >>> if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM && bo->ttm == NULL) {
> >>> ttm_bo_move_null(bo, new_mem);
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> }
> >>> if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> >>> new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) {
> >>> ttm_bo_move_null(bo, new_mem);
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
> >>> @@ -259,31 +247,37 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> >>> radeon_ttm_tt_unbind(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
> >>> ttm_resource_free(bo, &bo->mem);
> >>> ttm_bo_assign_mem(bo, new_mem);
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> }
> >>> - if (!rdev->ring[radeon_copy_ring_index(rdev)].ready ||
> >>> - rdev->asic->copy.copy == NULL) {
> >>> - /* use memcpy */
> >>> - goto memcpy;
> >>> + if (rdev->ring[radeon_copy_ring_index(rdev)].ready &&
> >>> + rdev->asic->copy.copy != NULL) {
> >>> + if ((old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> >>> + new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) ||
> >>> + (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
> >>> + new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)) {
> >>> + hop->fpfn = 0;
> >>> + hop->lpfn = 0;
> >>> + hop->mem_type = TTM_PL_TT;
> >>> + hop->flags = 0;
> >>> + return -EMULTIHOP;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + r = radeon_move_blit(bo, evict, new_mem, old_mem);
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + r = -ENODEV;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - r = radeon_move_blit(bo, evict, new_mem, old_mem);
> >>> if (r) {
> >>> -memcpy:
> >>> r = ttm_bo_move_memcpy(bo, ctx, new_mem);
> >>> - if (r) {
> >>> - goto fail;
> >>> - }
> >>> + if (r)
> >>> + return r;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +out:
> >>> /* update statistics */
> >>> atomic64_add((u64)bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT, &rdev->num_bytes_moved);
> >>> + radeon_bo_move_notify(bo, evict, new_mem);
> >>> return 0;
> >>> -fail:
> >>> - swap(*new_mem, bo->mem);
> >>> - radeon_bo_move_notify(bo, false, new_mem);
> >>> - swap(*new_mem, bo->mem);
> >>> - return r;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static int radeon_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_resource *mem)
> >>> --
> >>> 2.25.1
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> dri-devel mailing list
> >>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Vetter
> >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> >> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> amd-gfx mailing list
> >> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
