Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for GPU load values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hoi Lucas

Am Fr., 10. Juli 2020 um 10:31 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 09:41 +0200 schrieb Christian Gmeiner:
> > This patch series add support for loadavg values for GPU
> > sub-components. I am adding a SMA algorithm as I was not
> > really sure if EWMA would be a good fit for this use case.
>
> 1 second is a pretty long window in GPU time. Why do you feel that a
> simple moving average is more appropriate than a exponentially
> weighted one here? Note that I haven't given this any thought myself
> and haven't made up my mind yet, so this is a honest question to
> understand the reasoning behind your choice.
>

I played with both variants but I 'feel' that SMA might be a better
fit. To be honest I
have no background in signal processing and stuff like this so.. I
will go the route you
guide me to :) I have kept the "interface" for SMA equal to the one EWMA uses
so I can easily switch between them.

-- 
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc

https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux