Hi Christian, Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 09:41 +0200 schrieb Christian Gmeiner: > This patch series add support for loadavg values for GPU > sub-components. I am adding a SMA algorithm as I was not > really sure if EWMA would be a good fit for this use case. 1 second is a pretty long window in GPU time. Why do you feel that a simple moving average is more appropriate than a exponentially weighted one here? Note that I haven't given this any thought myself and haven't made up my mind yet, so this is a honest question to understand the reasoning behind your choice. Regards, Lucas > Christian Gmeiner (4): > drm/etnaviv: add simple moving average (SMA) > drm/etnaviv: add loadavg accounting > drm/etnaviv: show loadavg in debugfs > drm/etnaviv: export loadavg via perfmon > > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 14 ++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c | 44 ++++++++++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.h | 29 +++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_perfmon.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sma.h | 53 +++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sma.h > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
