Hi GVRao,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 10:29:19PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 02:50:55AM +0530, Venkateshwar Rao Gannavarapu wrote:
> > This add a dt binding for Xilinx DSI TX subsystem.
> >
> > The Xilinx MIPI DSI (Display serial interface) Transmitter Subsystem
> > implements the Mobile Industry Processor Interface (MIPI) based display
> > interface. It supports the interface with the programmable logic (FPGA).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Venkateshwar Rao Gannavarapu <venkateshwar.rao.gannavarapu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.txt | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Sorry, but new bindings in DT Schema format (.yaml) please.
> We are working on migrating all bindings to DT Schema and do not want
> to add new bindings in the old format.
>
> > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ef69729
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> > +Device-Tree bindings for Xilinx MIPI DSI Tx IP core
> > +
> > +The IP core supports transmission of video data in MIPI DSI protocol.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > + - compatible: Should be "xlnx-dsi".
The compatible value should start with the vendor name, followed by a
comma, and then the device identifier. This should thus be "xlnx,dsi".
However, I think calling it just "dsi" isn't specific enough, as it
could also be a DSI RX. "xlnx,dsi-tx" would be a better value. As the IP
core is versioned, I would make it "xlnx,dsi-tx-v2.0" (assuming that's
the version you want to support). If you want to support v1.0 as well,
you can add "xlnx,dsi-tx-v1.0" as an option.
> > + - reg: physical base address and length of the registers set for the device.
Does this cover both the DSI TX registers and the D-PHY registers, or
only the DSI TX registers ? It should be specified.
> > + - xlnx,dsi-num-lanes: Possible number of DSI lanes for the Tx controller.
> > + The values should be 1, 2, 3 or 4. Based on xlnx,dsi-num-lanes and
> > + line rate for the MIPI D-PHY core in Mbps, the AXI4-stream received by
> > + Xilinx MIPI DSI Tx IP core adds markers as per DSI protocol and the packet
> > + thus framed is convered to serial data by MIPI D-PHY core. Please refer
> > + Xilinx pg238 for more details. This value should be equal to the number
> > + of lanes supported by the connected DSI panel. Panel has to support this
> > + value or has to be programmed to the same value that DSI Tx controller is
> > + configured to.
The protocol configuration register has an Active Lanes field that
reports the number of lanes. Could we read the information from the
register, and drop this property ?
> > + - xlnx,dsi-datatype: Color format. The value should be one of "MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888",
> > + "MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666", "MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666_PACKED" or "MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB565".
The example below (and the driver) use "xlnx,dsi-data-type".
Same comment as above, should this be read from the Pixel Format field
instead of being specified in DT ?
> > + - #address-cells, #size-cells: should be set respectively to <1> and <0>
> > + according to DSI host bindings (see MIPI DSI bindings [1])
> > + - clock-names: Must contain "s_axis_aclk" and "dphy_clk_200M" in same order as
> > + clocks listed in clocks property.
> > + - clocks: List of phandles to Video and 200Mhz DPHY clocks.
> > + - port: Logical block can be used / connected independently with
> > + external device. In the display controller port nodes, topology
> > + for entire pipeline should be described using the DT bindings defined in
> > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt.
I think you should put the "port" node in a "ports" node, as there's
also a panel subnode. Otherwise both the port and panel will compete for
#address-cells and #size-cells. It happens that both need those
properties to be 1 and 0 respectively, but isolating the two would be
cleaner.
There should also be a port for the AXI4-Stream interface. The common
practice is to number the input port@0 and the output port@1.
> > + - simple_panel: The subnode for connected panel. This represents the
This should be panel, not simple_panel.
> > + DSI peripheral connected to the DSI host node. Please refer to
> > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt. The
> > + simple-panel driver has auo,b101uan01 panel timing parameters added along
> > + with other existing panels. DSI driver derive the required Tx IP controller
> > + timing values from the panel timing parameters.
You can drop the last two sentences, DT bindings shouldn't mention
driver-specific implementations.
> Please always use either a port or a ports node.
>
> > +
> > +Required simple_panel properties:
> > + - compatible: Value should be one of the panel names in
> > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/. e.g. "auo,b101uan01".
> > + For available panel compatible strings, please refer to bindings in
> > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/
This should be dropped too, it's out of scope.
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > + - xlnx,dsi-cmd-mode: denotes command mode enable.
I think this should be queried at runtime from the panel (if I'm not
mistaken it's reported through the mode_flags field of struct
mipi_dsi_device), and not specified in DT.
> > +
> > +[1]: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt
> > +[2]: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + mipi_dsi_tx_subsystem@80000000 {
> > + compatible = "xlnx,dsi";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x10000>;
DT example nodes, when using YAML, are put in a bus node that has
#address-cells and #size-cells both set to 1, so this needs to be
reg = <0x80000000 0x10000>;
> > + xlnx,dsi-num-lanes = <4>;
> > + xlnx,dsi-data-type = <MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-names = "dphy_clk_200M", "s_axis_aclk";
> > + clocks = <&misc_clk_0>, <&misc_clk_1>;
> > + encoder_dsi_port: port@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + dsi_encoder: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&xdsi_ep>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + simple_panel: simple-panel@0 {
You can drop unused labels.
> > + compatible = "auo,b101uan01";
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
This line doesn't appear to be needed.
> > + };
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
