On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 08:06:59PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> When graph isn't defined in a device-tree, the of_graph_get_remote_node()
> prints a noisy error message, telling that port node is not found. This is
> undesirable behaviour in our case because absence of a panel/bridge graph
> is a valid case. Let's check presence of the local port in a device-tree
> before proceeding with parsing the graph.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> index b50b44e76279..e0652c38f357 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> @@ -239,13 +239,24 @@ int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
> struct drm_bridge **bridge)
> {
> int ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - struct device_node *remote;
> + struct device_node *local, *remote;
>
> if (!panel && !bridge)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (panel)
> *panel = NULL;
>
> + /*
> + * of_graph_get_remote_node() produces a noisy error message if port
> + * node isn't found and the absence of the port is a legit case here,
> + * so at first we silently check presence of the local port.
> + */
> + local = of_graph_get_local_port(np);
> + if (!local)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + of_node_put(local);
> +
> remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
> if (!remote)
> return -ENODEV;
> --
> 2.26.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
