Although it's not unexpected for drm_dp_check_act_status() to fail due
to DPCD read failures (as the hub may have just been unplugged
suddenly), timeouts are a bit more worrying as they either mean we need
a longer timeout value, or we aren't setting up payload allocations
properly. So, let's start printing errors on timeouts.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index f313407374ed..3d0d373f6f91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -4494,6 +4494,10 @@ int drm_dp_check_act_status(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATE_STATUS,
&status);
if (ret < 0) {
+ /*
+ * Failure here isn't unexpected - the hub may have
+ * just been unplugged
+ */
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to read payload table status %d\n",
ret);
return ret;
@@ -4505,8 +4509,8 @@ int drm_dp_check_act_status(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
} while (jiffies < timeout);
if (!(status & DP_PAYLOAD_ACT_HANDLED)) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ACT bit %d after %dms\n",
- status, timeout_ms);
+ DRM_ERROR("Failed to get ACT after %dms, last status: %02x\n",
+ timeout_ms, status);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
