On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:18 AM Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 11.03.20 um 04:43 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> > Explicit synchronization is the future. At least, that seems to be what
> > most userspace APIs are agreeing on at this point. However, most of our
> > Linux APIs (both userspace and kernel UAPI) are currently built around
> > implicit synchronization with dma-buf. While work is ongoing to change
> > many of the userspace APIs and protocols to an explicit synchronization
> > model, switching over piecemeal is difficult due to the number of
> > potential components involved. On the kernel side, many drivers use
> > dma-buf including GPU (3D/compute), display, v4l, and others. In
> > userspace, we have X11, several Wayland compositors, 3D drivers, compute
> > drivers (OpenCL etc.), media encode/decode, and the list goes on.
> >
> > This patch provides a path forward by allowing userspace to manually
> > manage the fences attached to a dma-buf. Alternatively, one can think
> > of this as making dma-buf's implicit synchronization simply a carrier
> > for an explicit fence. This is accomplished by adding two IOCTLs to
> > dma-buf for importing and exporting a sync file to/from the dma-buf.
> > This way a userspace component which is uses explicit synchronization,
> > such as a Vulkan driver, can manually set the write fence on a buffer
> > before handing it off to an implicitly synchronized component such as a
> > Wayland compositor or video encoder. In this way, each of the different
> > components can be upgraded to an explicit synchronization model one at a
> > time as long as the userspace pieces connecting them are aware of it and
> > import/export fences at the right times.
> >
> > There is a potential race condition with this API if userspace is not
> > careful. A typical use case for implicit synchronization is to wait for
> > the dma-buf to be ready, use it, and then signal it for some other
> > component. Because a sync_file cannot be created until it is guaranteed
> > to complete in finite time, userspace can only signal the dma-buf after
> > it has already submitted the work which uses it to the kernel and has
> > received a sync_file back. There is no way to atomically submit a
> > wait-use-signal operation. This is not, however, really a problem with
> > this API so much as it is a problem with explicit synchronization
> > itself. The way this is typically handled is to have very explicit
> > ownership transfer points in the API or protocol which ensure that only
> > one component is using it at any given time. Both X11 (via the PRESENT
> > extension) and Wayland provide such ownership transfer points via
> > explicit present and idle messages.
> >
> > The decision was intentionally made in this patch to make the import and
> > export operations IOCTLs on the dma-buf itself rather than as a DRM
> > IOCTL. This makes it the import/export operation universal across all
> > components which use dma-buf including GPU, display, v4l, and others.
> > It also means that a userspace component can do the import/export
> > without access to the DRM fd which may be tricky to get in cases where
> > the client communicates with DRM via a userspace API such as OpenGL or
> > Vulkan. At a future date we may choose to add direct import/export APIs
> > to components such as drm_syncobj to avoid allocating a file descriptor
> > and going through two ioctls. However, that seems to be something of a
> > micro-optimization as import/export operations are likely to happen at a
> > rate of a few per frame of rendered or decoded video.
> >
> > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> > when importing an exclusive fence.
> >
> > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> > - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> > - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> >
> > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 13 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index d4097856c86b..09973c689866 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> > #include <linux/poll.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > @@ -348,6 +349,95 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static long dma_buf_wait_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > + const void __user *user_data)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_buf_sync_file arg;
> > + struct dma_fence *fence;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (arg.flags != 0 && arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + fence = sync_file_get_fence(arg.fd);
> > + if (!fence)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE) {
> > + struct dma_fence *singleton = NULL;
> > + ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, fence, &singleton);
> > + if (!ret && singleton)
> > + dma_resv_add_excl_fence(dmabuf->resv, singleton);
> > + } else {
> > + dma_resv_add_shared_fence(dmabuf->resv, fence);
> > + }
>
> You also need to create a singleton when adding a shared fences.
>
> The problem is that shared fences must always signal after exclusive
> ones and you can't guarantee that for the fence you add here.
I'm beginning to think that I should just drop the flags and always
wait on all fences and always take what's currently the "write" path.
Otherwise, something's going to get it wrong somewhere. Thoughts?
Also, Michelle (added to CC) commented on IRC today that amdgpu does
something with implicit sync fences where it sorts out the fences
which affect one queue vs. others. He thought that stuffing fences in
the dma-buf in this way might cause that to not work. Thoughts?
--Jason
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> > +
> > + dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
> > +
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static long dma_buf_signal_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > + void __user *user_data)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_buf_sync_file arg;
> > + struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > + struct sync_file *sync_file;
> > + int fd, ret;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (arg.flags != 0 && arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > + if (fd < 0)
> > + return fd;
> > +
> > + if (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE) {
> > + /* We need to include both the exclusive fence and all of
> > + * the shared fences in our fence.
> > + */
> > + ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, NULL, &fence);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_put_fd;
> > + } else {
> > + fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(dmabuf->resv);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!fence)
> > + fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> > +
> > + sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> > +
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +
> > + if (!sync_file) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_put_fd;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> > +
> > + arg.fd = fd;
> > + if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_put_fd:
> > + put_unused_fd(fd);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > @@ -390,6 +480,12 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME:
> > return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
> >
> > + case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_WAIT_SYNC_FILE:
> > + return dma_buf_wait_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void __user *)arg);
> > +
> > + case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE:
> > + return dma_buf_signal_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
> > +
> > default:
> > return -ENOTTY;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index dbc7092e04b5..86e07acca90c 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -37,8 +37,17 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> >
> > #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN 32
> >
> > +struct dma_buf_sync_file {
> > + __u32 flags;
> > + __s32 fd;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE (1 << 0)
> > +
> > #define DMA_BUF_BASE 'b'
> > -#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> > -#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_WAIT_SYNC_FILE _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_sync)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3, struct dma_buf_sync)
> >
> > #endif
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
