Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: dma-buf: Add an API for importing and exporting sync files (v4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 11.03.20 um 04:43 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
Explicit synchronization is the future.  At least, that seems to be what
most userspace APIs are agreeing on at this point.  However, most of our
Linux APIs (both userspace and kernel UAPI) are currently built around
implicit synchronization with dma-buf.  While work is ongoing to change
many of the userspace APIs and protocols to an explicit synchronization
model, switching over piecemeal is difficult due to the number of
potential components involved.  On the kernel side, many drivers use
dma-buf including GPU (3D/compute), display, v4l, and others.  In
userspace, we have X11, several Wayland compositors, 3D drivers, compute
drivers (OpenCL etc.), media encode/decode, and the list goes on.

This patch provides a path forward by allowing userspace to manually
manage the fences attached to a dma-buf.  Alternatively, one can think
of this as making dma-buf's implicit synchronization simply a carrier
for an explicit fence.  This is accomplished by adding two IOCTLs to
dma-buf for importing and exporting a sync file to/from the dma-buf.
This way a userspace component which is uses explicit synchronization,
such as a Vulkan driver, can manually set the write fence on a buffer
before handing it off to an implicitly synchronized component such as a
Wayland compositor or video encoder.  In this way, each of the different
components can be upgraded to an explicit synchronization model one at a
time as long as the userspace pieces connecting them are aware of it and
import/export fences at the right times.

There is a potential race condition with this API if userspace is not
careful.  A typical use case for implicit synchronization is to wait for
the dma-buf to be ready, use it, and then signal it for some other
component.  Because a sync_file cannot be created until it is guaranteed
to complete in finite time, userspace can only signal the dma-buf after
it has already submitted the work which uses it to the kernel and has
received a sync_file back.  There is no way to atomically submit a
wait-use-signal operation.  This is not, however, really a problem with
this API so much as it is a problem with explicit synchronization
itself.  The way this is typically handled is to have very explicit
ownership transfer points in the API or protocol which ensure that only
one component is using it at any given time.  Both X11 (via the PRESENT
extension) and Wayland provide such ownership transfer points via
explicit present and idle messages.

The decision was intentionally made in this patch to make the import and
export operations IOCTLs on the dma-buf itself rather than as a DRM
IOCTL.  This makes it the import/export operation universal across all
components which use dma-buf including GPU, display, v4l, and others.
It also means that a userspace component can do the import/export
without access to the DRM fd which may be tricky to get in cases where
the client communicates with DRM via a userspace API such as OpenGL or
Vulkan.  At a future date we may choose to add direct import/export APIs
to components such as drm_syncobj to avoid allocating a file descriptor
and going through two ioctls.  However, that seems to be something of a
micro-optimization as import/export operations are likely to happen at a
rate of a few per frame of rendered or decoded video.

v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
    when importing an exclusive fence.

v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file

v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 13 ++++-
  2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index d4097856c86b..09973c689866 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/sync_file.h>
  #include <linux/poll.h>
  #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
  #include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -348,6 +349,95 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
  	return ret;
  }
+static long dma_buf_wait_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+				   const void __user *user_data)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_sync_file arg;
+	struct dma_fence *fence;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (arg.flags != 0 && arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	fence = sync_file_get_fence(arg.fd);
+	if (!fence)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+
+	if (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE) {
+		struct dma_fence *singleton = NULL;
+		ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, fence, &singleton);
+		if (!ret && singleton)
+			dma_resv_add_excl_fence(dmabuf->resv, singleton);
+	} else {
+		dma_resv_add_shared_fence(dmabuf->resv, fence);
+	}

You also need to create a singleton when adding a shared fences.

The problem is that shared fences must always signal after exclusive ones and you can't guarantee that for the fence you add here.

Regards,
Christian.

+
+	dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
+
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static long dma_buf_signal_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+				     void __user *user_data)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_sync_file arg;
+	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
+	struct sync_file *sync_file;
+	int fd, ret;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (arg.flags != 0 && arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return fd;
+
+	if (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE) {
+		/* We need to include both the exclusive fence and all of
+		 * the shared fences in our fence.
+		 */
+		ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, NULL, &fence);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_put_fd;
+	} else {
+		fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(dmabuf->resv);
+	}
+
+	if (!fence)
+		fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
+
+	sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
+
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+	if (!sync_file) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_put_fd;
+	}
+
+	fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
+
+	arg.fd = fd;
+	if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_put_fd:
+	put_unused_fd(fd);
+	return ret;
+}
+
  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
  			  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
  {
@@ -390,6 +480,12 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
  	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME:
  		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
+ case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_WAIT_SYNC_FILE:
+		return dma_buf_wait_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void __user *)arg);
+
+	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE:
+		return dma_buf_signal_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
+
  	default:
  		return -ENOTTY;
  	}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
index dbc7092e04b5..86e07acca90c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -37,8 +37,17 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
#define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN 32 +struct dma_buf_sync_file {
+	__u32 flags;
+	__s32 fd;
+};
+
+#define DMA_BUF_SYNC_FILE_SYNC_WRITE	(1 << 0)
+
  #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
-#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
-#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
+#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	    _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	    _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
+#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_WAIT_SYNC_FILE	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_sync)
+#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3, struct dma_buf_sync)
#endif

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux