Re: [v4] vgacon: Fix a UAF in vgacon_invert_region

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:24:29AM +0800, Zhang Xiaoxu wrote:
> When syzkaller tests, there is a UAF:
>   BUG: KASan: use after free in vgacon_invert_region+0x9d/0x110 at addr
>     ffff880000100000
>   Read of size 2 by task syz-executor.1/16489
>   page:ffffea0000004000 count:0 mapcount:-127 mapping:          (null)
>   index:0x0
>   page flags: 0xfffff00000000()
>   page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>   CPU: 1 PID: 16489 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted
>   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
>   rel-1.9.3-0-ge2fc41e-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
>   Call Trace:
>     [<ffffffffb119f309>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20
>     [<ffffffffb04af957>] kasan_report+0x577/0x950
>     [<ffffffffb04ae652>] __asan_load2+0x62/0x80
>     [<ffffffffb090f26d>] vgacon_invert_region+0x9d/0x110
>     [<ffffffffb0a39d95>] invert_screen+0xe5/0x470
>     [<ffffffffb0a21dcb>] set_selection+0x44b/0x12f0
>     [<ffffffffb0a3bfae>] tioclinux+0xee/0x490
>     [<ffffffffb0a1d114>] vt_ioctl+0xff4/0x2670
>     [<ffffffffb0a0089a>] tty_ioctl+0x46a/0x1a10
>     [<ffffffffb052db3d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5bd/0xc40
>     [<ffffffffb052e2f2>] SyS_ioctl+0x132/0x170
>     [<ffffffffb11c9b1b>] system_call_fastpath+0x22/0x27
>     Memory state around the buggy address:
>      ffff8800000fff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>      00 00
>      ffff8800000fff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>      00 00 00
>     >ffff880000100000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>      ff ff ff
> 
> It can be reproduce in the linux mainline by the program:
>   #include <stdio.h>
>   #include <stdlib.h>
>   #include <unistd.h>
>   #include <fcntl.h>
>   #include <sys/types.h>
>   #include <sys/stat.h>
>   #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>   #include <linux/vt.h>
> 
>   struct tiocl_selection {
>     unsigned short xs;      /* X start */
>     unsigned short ys;      /* Y start */
>     unsigned short xe;      /* X end */
>     unsigned short ye;      /* Y end */
>     unsigned short sel_mode; /* selection mode */
>   };
> 
>   #define TIOCL_SETSEL    2
>   struct tiocl {
>     unsigned char type;
>     unsigned char pad;
>     struct tiocl_selection sel;
>   };
> 
>   int main()
>   {
>     int fd = 0;
>     const char *dev = "/dev/char/4:1";
> 
>     struct vt_consize v = {0};
>     struct tiocl tioc = {0};
> 
>     fd = open(dev, O_RDWR, 0);
> 
>     v.v_rows = 3346;
>     ioctl(fd, VT_RESIZEX, &v);
> 
>     tioc.type = TIOCL_SETSEL;
>     ioctl(fd, TIOCLINUX, &tioc);
> 
>     return 0;
>   }
> 
> When resize the screen, update the 'vc->vc_size_row' to the new_row_size,
> but when 'set_origin' in 'vgacon_set_origin', vgacon use 'vga_vram_base'
> for 'vc_origin' and 'vc_visible_origin', not 'vc_screenbuf'. It maybe
> smaller than 'vc_screenbuf'. When TIOCLINUX, use the new_row_size to calc
> the offset, it maybe larger than the vga_vram_size in vgacon driver, then
> bad access.
> Also, if set an larger screenbuf firstly, then set an more larger
> screenbuf, when copy old_origin to new_origin, a bad access may happen.
> 
> So, If the screen size larger than vga_vram, resize screen should be
> failed. This alse fix CVE-2020-8649 and CVE-2020-8647.
> 
> Fixes: 0aec4867dca14 ("[PATCH] SVGATextMode fix")
> Reference: CVE-2020-8647 and CVE-2020-8649
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx>

This seems to match the size computation used in other places in the vt
and vgacon code. So from that pov

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>

There's also no other "is this going to be bigger than the vga memory we
have" checks anywhere, so makes sense to do that. There's a few copy
helpers that limit the copy size to the max of vga_ram_size and
vc->vc_screenbuf_size, but seems like not really done consistently. So
seems to make sense, but really how did I end up getting listed as
maintainer for vt stuff :-/

Anyway also needs

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Linus, since this missed the -fixes pull from Dave maybe double check I'm
not grossly wrong here and apply directly?

Thanks, Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/video/console/vgacon.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c b/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c
> index de7b8382aba9..998b0de1812f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c
> @@ -1316,6 +1316,9 @@ static int vgacon_font_get(struct vc_data *c, struct console_font *font)
>  static int vgacon_resize(struct vc_data *c, unsigned int width,
>  			 unsigned int height, unsigned int user)
>  {
> +	if ((width << 1) * height > vga_vram_size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (width % 2 || width > screen_info.orig_video_cols ||
>  	    height > (screen_info.orig_video_lines * vga_default_font_height)/
>  	    c->vc_font.height)
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux