On Thu, 05 Mar 2020, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch adds defines for the detailed monitor
> range flags as per the EDID specification.
>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Clinton A Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kazlauskas Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_edid.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> index f0b03d401c27..f89c97623845 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ struct detailed_data_string {
> u8 str[13];
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> +#define EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x00
> +#define EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG 0x01
> +#define EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02
> +#define EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x04
Bikeshed for consideration:
drm_edid.h has some macros with DRM_EDID_ prefix, some with EDID_
prefix, and then some with no prefix at all really. Should we start
consolidating on something when we add more?
BR,
Jani.
> +
> struct detailed_data_monitor_range {
> u8 min_vfreq;
> u8 max_vfreq;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
