On 1/20/20 3:11 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 20/01/2020 15:53, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 16/01/2020 16:20, lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx wrote:
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
[...]
+enum em_type {
+ EM_SIMPLE,
+ EM_CPU,
+};
s/EM_SIMPLE/EM_DEV ?
Right now I only see energy models and _one_ specific type (the CPU EM).
So a tag 'is a CPU EM' would suffice. No need for EM_SIMPE ...
Wait, you even have
struct em_device {
struct em_perf_domain *em_pd;
struct device *dev;
...
}
static bool _is_cpu_device(struct device *dev)
Shouldn't this be enough to distinguish between EM and special CPU EM
under the API? Even when required to use container_of() to get from
em_perf_domain to device.
Agree, I will remove this em_type related code.
Lukasz
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
