On 20/01/2020 15:53, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 16/01/2020 16:20, lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
[...]
>> +enum em_type {
>> + EM_SIMPLE,
>> + EM_CPU,
>> +};
>
> s/EM_SIMPLE/EM_DEV ?
>
> Right now I only see energy models and _one_ specific type (the CPU EM).
> So a tag 'is a CPU EM' would suffice. No need for EM_SIMPE ...
Wait, you even have
struct em_device {
struct em_perf_domain *em_pd;
struct device *dev;
...
}
static bool _is_cpu_device(struct device *dev)
Shouldn't this be enough to distinguish between EM and special CPU EM
under the API? Even when required to use container_of() to get from
em_perf_domain to device.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
