On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> From: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the
> requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly
> closer to the requested rate than if the conservative lower pixel-clock
> rate is selected. The fixed patch has the logic the other way around and
> actually prefers the higher frequency. Fix that.
>
> Fixes: f6f7ad323461 ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
The id is wrong here - the right one is: 9946a3a9dbedaaacef8b7e94f6ac144f1daaf1de
The wrong id above was used before - so I think it is a copy'n'paste
thing.
Hint: try "dim fixes 9946a3a9dbedaaacef8b7e94f6ac144f1daaf1de"
If I get a quick response from Lee I can fix it up while applying.
Sam
> Reported-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index 721fa88bf71d..10985134ce0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
> int div_low = prate / mode_rate;
>
> if (div_low >= 2 &&
> - ((prate / div_low - mode_rate) <
> - 10 * (mode_rate - prate / div)))
> + (10 * (prate / div_low - mode_rate) <
> + (mode_rate - prate / div)))
> /*
> * At least 10 times better when using a higher
> * frequency than requested, instead of a lower.
> --
> 2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
