Den 15.11.2019 13.34, skrev Ville Syrjälä: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +0000, coypu@xxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely >> used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license >> is a bonus. Thanks for writing it and bearing with us. >> >> Would rewrites done purely for licensing reasons be accepted upstream? > > Rewrite should be the last resort. I think a lot of the GPL only stuff > is quite recent so there's a good chance the author(s) are still around > to discuss relicensing. > If someone sends patches to MIT license the work I've done, I'll be happy to ack it. It's only recently that I've been aware of the fact that MIT licensed was a thing in the kernel. I was under the impression that all new code should be GPL and MIT were for code imported from elsewhere. I would love to see my work being used on the BSD's. Noralf. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
