On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can > > > provide an ACK. > > > > Ack. > > Thanks! > > > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the > > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO > > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff > > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.) > > > > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review. > > Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent > to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose. > > > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here? > > No issue. > > What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an > immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would > have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine. For next time around, just ping one of the drm-misc (or drm maintainers) for an ack to merge it through a different tree. Or ask them what they want to do. committer model isn't 100% free-wheeling, for cross-tree stuff you still have maintainers who're supposed to do their jobs :-) But by default everyone will assume you'll just commit, so you need to poke them explicitly (like you've done here). -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
