On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can > > provide an ACK. > > Ack. Thanks! > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.) > > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review. Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose. > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here? No issue. What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
