On 23/09/2019 18:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
> resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors
> twice.
>
> In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Remove second error message from calling panfrost_regulator_init().
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
> index 46b0b02e4289..287c6ba314d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ static int panfrost_regulator_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> pfdev->regulator = NULL;
> if (ret == -ENODEV)
> return 0;
> - dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to get regulator: %d\n", ret);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to get regulator: %d\n",
> + ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -133,10 +135,8 @@ int panfrost_device_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> }
>
> err = panfrost_regulator_init(pfdev);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(pfdev->dev, "regulator init failed %d\n", err);
> + if (err)
> goto err_out0;
> - }
>
> err = panfrost_reset_init(pfdev);
> if (err) {
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
