There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors
twice.
In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
1. Remove second error message from calling panfrost_regulator_init().
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
index 46b0b02e4289..287c6ba314d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ static int panfrost_regulator_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
pfdev->regulator = NULL;
if (ret == -ENODEV)
return 0;
- dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to get regulator: %d\n", ret);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to get regulator: %d\n",
+ ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -133,10 +135,8 @@ int panfrost_device_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
}
err = panfrost_regulator_init(pfdev);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(pfdev->dev, "regulator init failed %d\n", err);
+ if (err)
goto err_out0;
- }
err = panfrost_reset_init(pfdev);
if (err) {
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
