Hi Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang: >> Thank you for testing. But don't get too excited, because the patch >> simulates a bug that was present in the original mgag200 code. A >> significant number of frames are simply skipped. That is apparently the >> reason why it's faster. > > Thanks for the detailed info, so the original code skips time-consuming > work inside atomic context on purpose. Is there any space to optmise it? > If 2 scheduled update worker are handled at almost same time, can one be > skipped? To my knowledge, there's only one instance of the worker. Re-scheduling the worker before a previous instance started, will not create a second instance. The worker's instance will complete all pending updates. So in some way, skipping workers already happens. Best regards Thomas > > Thanks, > Feng > >> >> Best regards >> Thomas > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
