Re: [PATCH] drm/komeda: Adds internal bpp computing for arm afbc only format YU08 YU10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Liviu,

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:23PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Hi Lowry,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:51:02AM +0000, Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > The drm_format_info doesn't have any cpp or block_size (both are zero)
> > information for arm only afbc format YU08/YU10. we need to compute it
> > by ourselves.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c    | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h    |  3 +++
> >  .../drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c    |  6 ++++--
> >  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> > index cd4d9f5..3c9e060 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,29 @@
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +u32 komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(const struct drm_format_info *info, u64 modifier)
> > +{
> > +	u32 bpp;
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR);
> 
> Is it not better to return the value from info->char_per_block if modifier is
> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR? Or return 0?
This function is only working for the afbc format and will remove this
WARN_ON check.
> > +
> > +	switch (info->format) {
> > +	case DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT:
> > +		bpp = 12;
> > +		break;
> > +	case DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT:
> > +		bpp = 15;
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		bpp = info->cpp[0] * 8;
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(bpp == 0);
> > +
> > +	return bpp;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Two assumptions
> >   * 1. RGB always has YTR
> >   * 2. Tiled RGB always has SC
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> > index 3631910..32273cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> > @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static inline const char *komeda_get_format_name(u32 fourcc, u64 modifier)
> >  komeda_get_format_caps(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> >  		       u32 fourcc, u64 modifier);
> >  
> > +u32 komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(const struct drm_format_info *info,
> > +			       u64 modifier);
> > +
> >  u32 *komeda_get_layer_fourcc_list(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> >  				  u32 layer_type, u32 *n_fmts);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> > index 10bf63e..966d0c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int komeda_fb_create_handle(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >  	const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format;
> >  	struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> >  	u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header;
> > -	u32 n_blocks = 0, min_size = 0;
> > +	u32 n_blocks = 0, min_size = 0, bpp;
> >  
> >  	obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]);
> >  	if (!obj) {
> > @@ -86,10 +86,12 @@ static int komeda_fb_create_handle(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >  	kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE,
> >  				    alignment_header);
> >  
> > +	bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier);
> >  	kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks *
> > -			 ALIGN(info->cpp[0] * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS,
> > +			 ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8,
> >  			       AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT);
> >  	min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0];
> > +
> >  	if (min_size > obj->size) {
> >  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%lx. min_size 0x%x.\n",
> >  			      obj->size, min_size);
> 
> Patch doesn't apply to tip of drm-misc-next. What is this patch depending on?
> 
> Best regards,
> Liviu
Will rebase and send again. Thanks for the review.

Best regards,
Lowry
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> ====================
> | I would like to |
> | fix the world,  |
> | but they're not |
> | giving me the   |
>  \ source code!  /
>   ---------------
>     ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

-- 
Regards,
Lowry
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux