Hi Lowry,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:51:02AM +0000, Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> The drm_format_info doesn't have any cpp or block_size (both are zero)
> information for arm only afbc format YU08/YU10. we need to compute it
> by ourselves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 3 +++
> .../drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 6 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> index cd4d9f5..3c9e060 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,29 @@
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +u32 komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(const struct drm_format_info *info, u64 modifier)
> +{
> + u32 bpp;
> +
> + WARN_ON(modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR);
Is it not better to return the value from info->char_per_block if modifier is
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR? Or return 0?
> +
> + switch (info->format) {
> + case DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_8BIT:
> + bpp = 12;
> + break;
> + case DRM_FORMAT_YUV420_10BIT:
> + bpp = 15;
> + break;
> + default:
> + bpp = info->cpp[0] * 8;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + WARN_ON(bpp == 0);
> +
> + return bpp;
> +}
> +
> /* Two assumptions
> * 1. RGB always has YTR
> * 2. Tiled RGB always has SC
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> index 3631910..32273cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static inline const char *komeda_get_format_name(u32 fourcc, u64 modifier)
> komeda_get_format_caps(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> u32 fourcc, u64 modifier);
>
> +u32 komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(const struct drm_format_info *info,
> + u64 modifier);
> +
> u32 *komeda_get_layer_fourcc_list(struct komeda_format_caps_table *table,
> u32 layer_type, u32 *n_fmts);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> index 10bf63e..966d0c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int komeda_fb_create_handle(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format;
> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header;
> - u32 n_blocks = 0, min_size = 0;
> + u32 n_blocks = 0, min_size = 0, bpp;
>
> obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]);
> if (!obj) {
> @@ -86,10 +86,12 @@ static int komeda_fb_create_handle(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE,
> alignment_header);
>
> + bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier);
> kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks *
> - ALIGN(info->cpp[0] * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS,
> + ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8,
> AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT);
> min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0];
> +
> if (min_size > obj->size) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%lx. min_size 0x%x.\n",
> obj->size, min_size);
Patch doesn't apply to tip of drm-misc-next. What is this patch depending on?
Best regards,
Liviu
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
