Hi Fabrizio,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:34:06AM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> The companion encoder needs to be told to use the same
> mode as the primary encoder.
>
> Fixes: e9e8798ab7b8 ("drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add support for dual-link mode")
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> index edd63f5..7944ae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> @@ -415,8 +415,12 @@ static void rcar_lvds_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> return;
>
> /* Enable the companion LVDS encoder in dual-link mode. */
> - if (lvds->dual_link && lvds->companion)
> + if (lvds->dual_link && lvds->companion) {
> + struct rcar_lvds *companion_lvds = bridge_to_rcar_lvds(
> + lvds->companion);
> + companion_lvds->mode = lvds->mode;
> lvds->companion->funcs->enable(lvds->companion);
> + }
Would it make sense to do this in rcar_lvds_mode_set() instead, to keep
the mode set code grouped in a single place ?
>
> /*
> * Hardcode the channels and control signals routing for now.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
