What | Removed | Added |
---|---|---|
Status | REOPENED | RESOLVED |
Resolution | --- | INVALID |
Comment # 3
on bug 110967
from Jeremy Newton
The pro suffix denotes that it's a part of the PRO stack, not propriety (yes misleading name, I know). "PRO" does not mean it's closed source, though most of the PRO stack is closed. ROCT for example is MIT as it's borrowed from ROCm. As for the rest: -AMF is closed source AFAIK -opencl is closed source; this will be migrated to ROCm (MIT), but this is low priority since ROCm is already completely packaged elsewhere. We might strip the -pro from roct when we switch to ROCm, but I don't believe there's a plan set in stone right now. Closing as invalid for now.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel