| Bug ID | 110967 |
|---|---|
| Summary | Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source |
| Product | DRI |
| Version | unspecified |
| Hardware | Other |
| OS | All |
| Status | NEW |
| Severity | enhancement |
| Priority | medium |
| Component | DRM/AMDgpu-pro |
| Assignee | dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org |
| Reporter | ashark@linuxcomp.ru |
In 19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu there appeared packages roct-amdgpu-pro and roct-amdgpu-pro-dev. They have a MIT license, but contains -pro suffix. Is there any specific intention to do so? I thought that only proprietary packages should have that suffix. Also there are packages: amf-amdgpu-pro opencl-amdgpu-pro-comgr opencl-amdgpu-pro-dev opencl-amdgpu-pro-hip What about their suffixes?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
