On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-10-18, 08:34, Jordan Crouse wrote: > > I agree that consistency is good. But the GPU is by design outside of the > > control of the genpd universe so it is by design not using the same features. > > It unfortunately does happen to use a similar number in an OPP binding to > > construct the level mapping but since we can't read the cmd-db from the GMU > > space this is a necessary evil. > > Where do you define how to use this binding in case of GPU? I mean > some DT binding doc must have some information to avoid confusion as > all other users will have the qcom,level thing in the genpd's OPP > table which GPU will have it directly within its OPP table. When I first made the patch I was just using existing OPP bindings for GPU levels as the wording was generic enough to cover both cases. I would be happy to revisit that and indicate that the OPP bindings apply to RPMh and GPU/GMU as we've discussed in this thread. Jordan -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
