On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-10-18, 08:34, Jordan Crouse wrote: > > I agree that consistency is good. But the GPU is by design outside of the > > control of the genpd universe so it is by design not using the same features. > > It unfortunately does happen to use a similar number in an OPP binding to > > construct the level mapping but since we can't read the cmd-db from the GMU > > space this is a necessary evil. > > Where do you define how to use this binding in case of GPU? I mean > some DT binding doc must have some information to avoid confusion as > all other users will have the qcom,level thing in the genpd's OPP > table which GPU will have it directly within its OPP table. Jordan suggested to use the RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_* defines. These are defined in include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h. This header is only referenced in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt (Which this patch series does not seem to use.) This patch series does use Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/qcom-opp.txt but it does not reference include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h. So to further avoid confusion, perhaps it is better to create new defines, instead of reusing the RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_* defines? Kind regards, Niklas _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
