On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:16:28PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-08-18, 09:11, Jordan Crouse wrote: > > Add the nodes to describe the Adreno GPU and GMU devices. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > > index cdaabeb3c995..10db0ceb3699 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > > @@ -192,6 +192,59 @@ > > method = "smc"; > > }; > > > > +gpu_opp_table: adreno-opp-table { > > + compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level"; > > + > > + opp-710000000 { > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <710000000>; > > + qcom,level = <416>; > > What is qcom,level here ? Is it different than the RPM voting thing ? > > If not then you need to follow what Rajendra, Niklas are doing as > well. There needs to be a genpd which needs to carry this value and > the gpu's table will have required-opps entry to point to it. I don't think it is the same (we have some special considerations here) but I missed the new work from the other folks and I want to review it before I conclude one way or the other. Is there a link to the latest and greatest that I can use to get caught up? Jordan -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel