On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 17 May 2018 at 16:26, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> On 30 March 2018 at 15:11, Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them > >> > there rather than in our own subclass. As this makes the framebuffer > >> > create_handle and destroy functions the same as the GEM framebuffer > >> > helper, we can reuse those. > >> > >> Ping - have you had a chance to look at this? > > > > I haven't, I've not moved any of my trees off 4.16 yet as I've been > > away on vacation, and also busy dealing with Spectre for 32-bit ARM. > > > > From a quick look, it seems fine, and as I guess the autobuilders > > haven't complained, it probably builds okay. So it can probably > > be merged without much risk - if there are any problems I'll sort it > > out later. > > Thanks Russell. I did do a build test locally as well which had no > complaints. I'll merge this through drm-misc. Hi Daniel, I've not seen this go in during the last merge window, so I assume either it missed the window or it's been forgotten. Mind if I pick it up instead - I finally have armada on the way to atomic modeset conversion. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
