On 17 May 2018 at 16:26, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On 30 March 2018 at 15:11, Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them >> > there rather than in our own subclass. As this makes the framebuffer >> > create_handle and destroy functions the same as the GEM framebuffer >> > helper, we can reuse those. >> >> Ping - have you had a chance to look at this? > > I haven't, I've not moved any of my trees off 4.16 yet as I've been > away on vacation, and also busy dealing with Spectre for 32-bit ARM. > > From a quick look, it seems fine, and as I guess the autobuilders > haven't complained, it probably builds okay. So it can probably > be merged without much risk - if there are any problems I'll sort it > out later. Thanks Russell. I did do a build test locally as well which had no complaints. I'll merge this through drm-misc. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
