On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On 30 March 2018 at 15:11, Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them > > there rather than in our own subclass. As this makes the framebuffer > > create_handle and destroy functions the same as the GEM framebuffer > > helper, we can reuse those. > > Ping - have you had a chance to look at this? I haven't, I've not moved any of my trees off 4.16 yet as I've been away on vacation, and also busy dealing with Spectre for 32-bit ARM. >From a quick look, it seems fine, and as I guess the autobuilders haven't complained, it probably builds okay. So it can probably be merged without much risk - if there are any problems I'll sort it out later. Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
