On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:36:26AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > > It seems like all this is doing is flushing the PRI queue. > > A domain should have a dedicated flag unrelated to the type if it is > > using PRI and all PRI using domains should have the PRI queue flushed > > here, using the same code as flushing the PRI for a RID attachment. > Yes, or if the teardown op is domain-specific, then it works too? That could only sense if we end up creating a PRI domain type too.. Right now PRI is messy because it doesn't really work with unmanaged domains and that is something that will have to get fixed sort of soonish Once PRI is a proper thing then "SVA" is just a PRI domain that has a non-managed from-the-mm page table pointer. Most of the driver code marked svm should entirely disappear. Jason
