On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:59:56PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > On VT-d platforms, legacy DMA requests without PASID use device’s > default domain, where RID_PASID is always attached. Device drivers > can then use the DMA API for all in-kernel DMA on the RID. > > Ideally, devices capable of using ENQCMDS can also transparently use the > default domain, consequently DMA API. However, VT-d architecture > dictates that the PASID used by ENQCMDS must be different from the > RID_PASID value. > > To provide support for transparent use of DMA API with non-RID_PASID > value, this patch implements the set_dev_pasid() function for the > default domain. The idea is that device drivers wishing to use ENQCMDS > to submit work on buffers mapped by DMA API will call > iommu_attach_device_pasid() beforehand. > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > index 10f657828d3a..a0cb3bc851ac 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > @@ -4665,6 +4665,10 @@ static void intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid) > case IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA: > intel_svm_remove_dev_pasid(dev, pasid); > break; > + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA: > + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ: > + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY: Why do we need this switch statement anyhow? Something seems to have gone wrong here.. SVM shouldn't be special, and why does this call intel_pasid_tear_down_entry() twice on the SVA path? It seems like all this is doing is flushing the PRI queue. A domain should have a dedicated flag unrelated to the type if it is using PRI and all PRI using domains should have the PRI queue flushed here, using the same code as flushing the PRI for a RID attachment. Jason
