On 16-01-19, 11:53, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > >> + /* Free irqs */ > > > > But devm will automatically free it, no ? > > Yes, it shouldn't be there. I'll remove it. Nope this is correct. we need to ensure irqs are freed and tasklets are quiesced otherwise you can end up with a case when a spurious interrupt and then tasklets spinning while core unrolls. devm for irq is not a good idea unless you really know what you are doing! -- ~Vinod
