On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 18:03 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:18:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > +/* Bitfields in CTL_HI */ > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_BLOCK_TS_MASK GENMASK(16, 0) > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_BLOCK_TS(x) ((x) & > > IDMA32C_CTLH_BLOCK_TS_MASK) > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_DONE (1 << 17) > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_CH_WEIGHT_MASK GENMASK(28, 18) / > > * weight mask */ > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_CH_WEIGHT(x) ((x) << 18) /* > > weight */ > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_CH_CLASS_MASK GENMASK(31, 29) /* > > priority class mask */ > > +#define IDMA32C_CTLH_CH_CLASS(x) ((x) << 29) /* > > priority class */ > > Are we planning to support weights? Not in nearest future. Would you like me to remove those definitions? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
