Re: [PATCH 2/2] multipath.conf(5): improve documentation of dev_loss_tmo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



One of the Enterprise 7 variants, Claims "0.4.9" multipath but appears to have a number of recent features backported, so some frankensteined version.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 5:50 PM Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 17:44 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> The older distribution I checked has this for -T
>      -T tm:valid
>               check if tm matches the multipathd configuration
> timestamp value from /run/multipathd/timestamp If so, return success
> if valid is 1. Otherwise, return failure. If the timestamp doesn't
> match continue with multipath execution.  This option is designed to
> be used with -c by the udev rules.

Strange, I can't find this anywhere in the sources I know.
What distro is this? "multipath -T" in the sense I described has
existed since 0.7.7, so for more than 4 years.

Martin

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux