Re: [PATCH 2/2] multipath.conf(5): improve documentation of dev_loss_tmo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/3/22 00:50, Martin Wilck wrote:

On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 17:44 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
Thanks.

The older distribution I checked has this for -T
      -T tm:valid
               check if tm matches the multipathd configuration
timestamp value from /run/multipathd/timestamp If so, return success
if valid is 1. Otherwise, return failure. If the timestamp doesn't
match continue with multipath execution.  This option is designed to
be used with -c by the udev rules.

Strange, I can't find this anywhere in the sources I know.
What distro is this? "multipath -T" in the sense I described has
existed since 0.7.7, so for more than 4 years.

RH: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/device-mapper-multipath/blob/6738b34a0b0aabf1bc8c15d540bafa29ca99c58f/f/0158-RHBZ-1318581-timestamp-doc-fix.patch

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux