On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 18:00 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote: > One of the Enterprise 7 variants, Claims "0.4.9" multipath but > appears to have a number of recent features backported, so some > frankensteined version. > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 5:50 PM Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 17:44 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote: > > > Thanks. > > > > > > The older distribution I checked has this for -T > > > -T tm:valid > > > check if tm matches the multipathd configuration > > > timestamp value from /run/multipathd/timestamp If so, return > > > success > > > if valid is 1. Otherwise, return failure. If the timestamp > > > doesn't > > > match continue with multipath execution. This option is designed > > > to > > > be used with -c by the udev rules. > > > > Strange, I can't find this anywhere in the sources I know. > > What distro is this? "multipath -T" in the sense I described has > > existed since 0.7.7, so for more than 4 years. > > > > Martin > > Funny, Ben never told me there was a conflicting option name in RHEL. I guess it's too late now, as I said, the upstream option has existed for 4 years. Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
