On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 22:05 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 03/28/2018 09:54 PM, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > > COPYING.LIBRARY is really a very bad name. > > > > Why? I think it expresses quite nicely what it contains. > > Too generic word. > Because it can be assumed that all "libraries" included are > under that license. > Well, COPYING.LGPL, as you already suggested, might be a good compromise then. Cheers, Martin -- Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
