On 03/28/2018 12:03 AM, Martin Wilck wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 20:28 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> As recommended by FSF: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html >> >> Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> COPYING => COPYING.LESSER | 0 >> 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> rename COPYING => COPYING.LESSER (100%) >> >> diff --git a/COPYING b/COPYING.LESSER >> similarity index 100% >> rename from COPYING >> rename to COPYING.LESSER > > IMO you should only call it "COPYING.LESSER" if it's really the lesser > GPL (aka LGPLv2.1). LESSER is just the family of the licence, a tag. COPYING.LIBRARY is really a very bad name. But if Christophe see an objection to the "COPYING.LESSER" name, it could be rename to COPYING.LGPL -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
