On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 21:40 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 03/28/2018 12:03 AM, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > > > IMO you should only call it "COPYING.LESSER" if it's really the > > lesser > > GPL (aka LGPLv2.1). > > LESSER is just the family of the licence, a tag. I disagree. The name Lesser GPL was invented after the creation of the LGPLv2. It's misleading to name the file so, even if the differences between LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 are small. > COPYING.LIBRARY is really a very bad name. Why? I think it expresses quite nicely what it contains. Martin -- Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
