On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 17:12 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:15:55PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > +static void *alloc_request_size(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *data) > > > > I like alloc_request_simple() but alloc_request_size() seems a bit > > contrived. _reserve? _extra? _special? Don't have any good suggestions, > > I'm afraid. > > Not that I'm a fan of _size, but I like the other suggestions even less. Hello Christoph and Martin, How about using the function names alloc_full_request() / free_full_request() together with a comment that mentions that cmd_size is set by the LLD? Bart. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
