Re: [PATCH 05/18] block: allow specifying size for extra command data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:15:55PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> +static void *alloc_request_size(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *data)
> 
> I like alloc_request_simple() but alloc_request_size() seems a bit
> contrived. _reserve? _extra? _special? Don't have any good suggestions,
> I'm afraid.

Not that I'm a fan of _size, but I like the other suggestions even less.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux