On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:39:12AM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Alasdair, if you are OK with the approach below I propose you give an > Acked-by: and then we can feed the patch through Jens instead of dealing > with a clunky two-stage merge this late in the .33 game. > DM does not want to know about partition offsets. Add a partition-aware > wrapper that DM can use when stacking block devices. > +int bdev_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct block_device *bdev, > + sector_t start) Reviewed-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx> Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
