Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm-mpath: dynamic load balancers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
Hi Alasdair,

On 01/29/2009 12:37 AM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:50:38AM -0400, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
The following patches add the following 2 dynamic load balancers
to request-based dm-multipath:
  o queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-queue-length.
  o service-time oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-service-time.
Could we have separate Kconfig options to select them?

Sure.
I posted the new one rebased on top of 2.6.29-rc2:
  https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00183.html
  https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00186.html


For the Kconfig help, is there something we could add to help people know when to choose one or the other? Sort of like how the block layer io scheduler (block/Kconfig.iosched) says one might be helpful for desktops and one is useful for data bses?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux