Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
From: "Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:44:46 +0000
In-reply-to: <4981D772.9090704@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4970AFB8.6090906@xxxxxxxxxx> <1232122255.29644.23.camel@chandra-ubuntu> <4970B41C.1000509@xxxxxxxxxx> <4981D772.9090704@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: bmr@xxxxxxxxxx, device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)

shane bradley wrote:

Patch attached for updated wording of documentation on polling_interval.


Looks sane to me.

Cheers,
Bryn.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

References:
- multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
  - From: shane bradley
- Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
  - From: Chandra Seetharaman
- Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
  - From: shane bradley
- Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
  - From: shane bradley

Prev by Date: Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm-mpath: dynamic load balancers
Previous by thread: Re: multipath.conf and polling_interval option seems misleading
Next by thread: multipath-tools kpartx/devmapper.c kpartx/devm ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux