Hi Mike, Thank you for the comment. On 01/30/2009 03:12 AM +0900, Mike Christie wrote: > Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >> Hi Alasdair, >> >> On 01/29/2009 12:37 AM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:50:38AM -0400, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >>>> The following patches add the following 2 dynamic load balancers >>>> to request-based dm-multipath: >>>> o queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-queue-length. >>>> o service-time oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-service-time. >>> >>> Could we have separate Kconfig options to select them? >> >> Sure. >> I posted the new one rebased on top of 2.6.29-rc2: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00183.html >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00186.html >> > > For the Kconfig help, is there something we could add to help people > know when to choose one or the other? Sort of like how the block layer > io scheduler (block/Kconfig.iosched) says one might be helpful for > desktops and one is useful for data bses? That's a good idea, but I don't have much information about that now. To make such guide-line, we probably need lots of feedbacks from users. (e.g. That may also depend on HW, not only work-load.) So that is TODO in the future, I think. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
